Orissa High Court in the case of State of Odisha vs. Kailash Chandra Mallick and others W.P.C. No. 4446/2011, examined the issue as to whether compliance of Section 25G (last come first go) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is mandatory while terminating the employment of workmen. The Orissa High Court, placing reliance on the judgment of Supreme Court given in Jaipur Development Authority vs. Ramsahai (2006) 11 SCC 684, held on 18.5.22 that an employer would ordinarily be required to retrench the workman who was the last person to be employed in that category, however, for reasons to be recorded, the employer may retrench any other workman.
You may also like
News Section
Termination Of Services Without Disciplinary Enquiry Violates Principles Of Natural Justice : Supreme Court Reinstates College Registrar
April 20, 2024
News Section
Tide commits to incubate 500,000 women-led small businesses in India by the end of 2027
March 2, 2022
News Section
Attempt To Take Away Part Of Pension Or Gratuity Or Leave Encashment Without Any Statutory Provision Is Violative Of Article 300A Of Constitution: Andhra Pradesh HC
July 3, 2024
Author
November 2024
Cover Story
Notifications
- Revised Haryana Minimum Wages from 1.07.2024
- Delhi Minimum Wages Rates Revised w.e.f. 01-10-2024
- UP Govt. Guidelines for Women Safety
- Government of Punjab Extends 24/7 Exemption in Shops and Establishment
- Maharashtra Revises Minimum Wages for July 2024
- ESIC Applicability Criteria 08.07.2022
- Revised Minimum Wages of Punjab w.e.f. 01.03.2024
- EPFO Circular about Contribution under Section 6 not payable on Cost to Company (CTC)
Add comment