Enquiry vitiated if Enquiry Officer acts as prosecutor also: Raj. HC

Enquiry vitiated if Enquiry Officer acts as prosecutor also: Raj. HC

Rajasthan High Court in Mahendra Singh vs. Union of India S.B.C.W.P 5065/2002 on September 3, 2024, addressed issues of procedural fairness in disciplinary inquiries. The Court noted that the Enquiry Officer had acted improperly by serving as both prosecutor and judge, which compromised impartiality. This finding was based on the Supreme Court’s principle that an adjudicator must be unbiased, must not act as a prosecutor, and must not use personal knowledge or external influences in the inquiry. As the Enquiry Officer’s dual role violated these principles, the High Court set aside the dismissal order and directed that a new, impartial inquiry be conducted.

Stay connected with us on social media platforms for instant updates click here to join our LinkedInTwitter & Facebook

Business Manager

View all posts

November 2024

Tech & Human Equation

Submit Your Article

Would you like to share your views? submit your Aricle by clicking on the button below. Submit your Article
error: Content is protected !!