Karnataka High Court in B.M. Veena vs. The Divisional Controller, B.M.T.C. Volvo Division W.A No. 460/2022, while rejecting the contention of the employer [wherein it was contended that transfer is a part of service conditions and therefore notice of change as required under Section 9A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (“ID Act“) is not required] observed that the nature of work/service conditions would be changed and the consequences of transfer would result in the change of service conditions and the reduction of employees (at Dewas factory), therefore Section 9A of ID Act will get attracted.
Also read: ABP Network welcomes Sameer Rao as CEO of ABP Creations Pvt. Ltd.
Add comment