This edition cover story is on this crucial subject attempting to understand the nuances and getting to know through Industry HR experts as to how important it is to focus on it and how to enhance the Ex.
Onus to prove that employee was not gainfully employed during period of dismissal is on employer : Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has observed that the onus to prove that an employee was not gainfully employed elsewhere when his service was terminated is on the employer. An employee is not required to prove the negative that he was not gainfully employed. Once he asserts that he is not gainfully employed...
After two years of the pandemic, the last quarter proved to be exciting for job seekers as the markets finally opened up. As Indians gave more than 3 crore interviews in the last three months, a 13.71 percent jump in comparison to the previous quarter (October-December 21), apna.co, India’s largest...
While siding with the Karnataka High Court judgement in Bata’s Case against ‘Go Slow’ policy of its Union Workers, the Supreme Court observed that employer should provide opportunity of hearing before reducing salary of employees at a pro-rata basis. The Division Bench of Justice...
This edition cover story is an attempt to understand whether the posh law has delivered and met the objectives for which it was enacted along with other dimensions of the socio-legal complexity. Experts of the subjects are here to enrich readers with their wisdom and experience.
Findings of Internal Committee Not Enough to Dismiss Sexual Harassment Cases: Karnataka High Court
(IANS) :In an important ruling regarding sexual harassment cases at workplaces, the Karnataka High Court’s Division bench on Monday opined that findings of the internal committee against the accused is the not sole basis for dismissal. The bench headed by Justices Alok Aradhe and S. Vishwajith...