Madras HC in the case of Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organisation vs. Colorplus Fashions Ltd. and Ors. W.P. No. 18104/2012, while holding that the attendance bonus would qualify as ‘bonus’ for the purpose of exclusion from Section 2(b)(ii) of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (“EPF Act“) observed that ‘attendance bonus’ is an inducement amount paid to the employees who reported to the work regularly without absenting themselves and without availing any leave and if an employee failed to turn up for the required number of days, and thus the nature of ‘attendance bonus’ is (a) found to be variable; (b) not common; (c) not granted by all industrial concerns and (d) not paid to all employees within an industrial concern.
You may also like
March 21, 2023
October 18, 2023
News Section
Disputes Regarding Absorption/Regularization Can Only Be Done By Union On Behalf Of Workman: Karnataka HC
February 5, 2024
Author
November 2024
Cover Story
Notifications
- Revised Haryana Minimum Wages from 1.07.2024
- Delhi Minimum Wages Rates Revised w.e.f. 01-10-2024
- UP Govt. Guidelines for Women Safety
- Government of Punjab Extends 24/7 Exemption in Shops and Establishment
- Maharashtra Revises Minimum Wages for July 2024
- ESIC Applicability Criteria 08.07.2022
- Revised Minimum Wages of Punjab w.e.f. 01.03.2024
- EPFO Circular about Contribution under Section 6 not payable on Cost to Company (CTC)
Add comment