Madras HC in the case of Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organisation vs. Colorplus Fashions Ltd. and Ors. W.P. No. 18104/2012, while holding that the attendance bonus would qualify as ‘bonus’ for the purpose of exclusion from Section 2(b)(ii) of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (“EPF Act“) observed that ‘attendance bonus’ is an inducement amount paid to the employees who reported to the work regularly without absenting themselves and without availing any leave and if an employee failed to turn up for the required number of days, and thus the nature of ‘attendance bonus’ is (a) found to be variable; (b) not common; (c) not granted by all industrial concerns and (d) not paid to all employees within an industrial concern.


You may also like
March 25, 2022
January 27, 2024
News Section, People Movement
Unilever appoints BP Biddappa as Chief People, Transformation, and Sustainability Officer for South Asia
April 30, 2024
Author
April 2025

Cover Story
Notifications
- UP-Minimum Wages Rates from 01-04-2025 to 30-09-2025
- Maharashtra Government Revises Minimum Wages for January 2025
- The Chhattisgarh Shops and Establishments (Regulation of Employment and conditions of service) Act w.e.f. 13.02.2025
- Assam Revises Minimum Wages w.e.f. 01/06/2024
- Rajasthan Private Security Agencies Regulation Amendment Rules 2024
- Employees deposit linked Insurance Scheme (second amendment) 2024 dated 18.11.24 made effective from 28.04.2024
- Revised Haryana Minimum Wages from 1.07.2024
- Delhi Minimum Wages Rates Revised w.e.f. 01-10-2024
Add comment